Donald Trump campaigned on two things his voters could measure at the pump and the ballot box: cheap gas and no new wars. He delivered the opposite. Gas prices are now at a four-year high, the United States is at war with Iran, and some of the people who believed the pitch are beginning to notice the invoice.
The New York Times talked to Trump voters across several battleground states as they filled up their cars. The conversations were revealing. Some still back him. Some think the war is necessary. Others are starting to sound like people who bought the “businessman” routine and got a receipt with missiles on it.
Gas prices are up, war is on, and voters are paying attention
Since Trump took the country to war with Iran, gasoline prices have climbed to their highest levels in four years. As of Sunday, the average price of gas had decreased slightly to $4.34 a gallon—more than a dollar higher than the same time last year. Trump has said he is negotiating a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to oil shipping, but the pump prices remain stubbornly elevated.
Are his voters angry? Not uniformly. According to the latest New York Times/Siena poll, more than two-thirds say they approve of his handling of the war, and about six in 10 support his handling of the cost of living. But the cracks are visible. A fifth of Trump voters say the war is not worth the cost. A third are unsure.
One Michigan voter told the Times that filling up “hurts.” A Cincinnati voter said the second Trump term did not give him “the greatest feeling.” Another former supporter said Trump’s first administration was great, but now the war and gas prices are making things feel very different.
The platform was groceries and gas, the delivery was conflict and costs
Trump ran on the price of eggs, the cost of gas, and the promise of peace through strength. The campaign pitch was simple: vote for me, and your wallet gets lighter at the grocery store and the gas station, and your sons stay home. That was the deal.
The deal did not include a war with Iran. It did not include $4.34-a-gallon gas in May. It did not include midterm voters in battleground states standing at the pump doing the math on whether this was worth it.
At some point, the campaign that promised low prices and no conflicts has to reconcile with high prices during a conflict. The voters who believed the pitch are now holding the receipt, and some of them are beginning to read it closely.
Midterm math and the price of loyalty
The November midterm elections are five months away. Trump voters are wrestling with pain at the pump and contemplating whether it should factor into their decisions in the fall. The poll numbers suggest most still approve of his handling of both the war and the cost of living, but a third are unsure whether the war is worth the cost. That is not a mandate. That is a question mark.
The problem with running on grocery bills, gas prices, and foreign-policy toughness is that eventually the receipt comes out of the pump. Voters who were promised cheap gas and no new wars are now paying more for gas during a new war. Some of them are fine with it. Some are not. The ones who are not are the ones worth watching.
Trump has framed the war as necessary and the gas prices as temporary. Whether that narrative holds through the summer and into the fall depends on whether the Strait of Hormuz reopens, whether prices drop, and whether voters decide the cost was worth the outcome. None of those things are guaranteed.
The question is whether Trump voters in battleground states will accept high gas prices and a war with Iran as the cost of whatever they believe they are getting in return, or whether the invoice becomes the thing that flips the midterms.
Sources:
